Original Article
                        
                             
                        
                        
                                
                        Reliability and validity of the Questionnaire on Annual Physical Activity Pattern: A validation study using combined heart rate and accelerometry data as an objective measurement
 
                    
                        Boris A Brühmann, Martina E Schmidt, Angelika Wientzek, Matthäus Vigl, Birgit Teucher, Verena A Katzke, Heiner Boeing, Manuela M Bergmann, Rudolf Kaaks and Karen Steindorf
                        World Journal of Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention 2014, 3:7
                        
                    Abstract
                     
                         
Introduction
  Physical activity (PA) is a modifiable lifestyle factor with great public health potential. However, it is still unclear which type, intensity, and temporal pattern of PAis most beneficial. Therefore, a Questionnaire on Annual Physical Activity Pattern (QUAP) for healthy adults was developed; focusing on a detailed assessment of past year PA.The aim was to investigate its test-retest reliability and validity. 
  
    Materials and Methods 
  
  The self-administered 22-item questionnaire was evaluated in a study embedded into the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) project. Participants included men and women aged 47-82. Reliability was examined in 119 participants by comparing two measurements taken 6-8 weeks apart. Criterion validity was examined in 1109 participants by comparing the physical activity level (PAL) derived from an accelerometry device (Actiheart) to those from the questionnaire.
  
    Results 
  
  Reliability was acceptable overall with intraclass correlationcoefficients ranging from 0.64 to 0.87, with the exception of the domain sedentary behaviour (r=0.43).Regarding validity, the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.33. Slightly higher correlations were found for men (rs=0.34), and participants with a lower BMI (rs=0.36). Bland-Altman plots showed a mean difference of -0.00 (SD=0.22) for total PA.
  
    Conclusions
  
  Our findings suggest that the questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity comparable to other questionnaires. It enables the identification of domain-specific activity patterns and a differentiation between participants with similar energy expenditure but different behaviour. This additional information about distinct activity patterns may finally enable researchers to analyse PA more specifically in terms of health benefits and to provide more detailed public health recommendations
  
    Keywords
  
  Questionnaire, accelerometer, epidemiology, reliability, validity, physical activity
                         
                      
                          Download PDF   
                          
                          Full Text