Review
Management of Arterial Hemorrhage by Pseudoaneurysms Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy
1 Naoki Hashimoto
- 1Kindai University, School of Medicine, Japan
- Submitted: Friday, September 16, 2016
- Accepted: Tuesday, October 18, 2016
- Published: Thursday, October 20, 2016
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Abstract
Bleeding pseudoaneurysms are among the most serious and fatal complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Sentinel bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy indicates local sepsis and anastomotic dehiscence. Therefore, I think recognition of the significance of “sentinel bleeding” and prompt response may prevent exsanguination. Therapeutic embolization should be the initial procedure. This is technically easier for the patient and the surgeon, and there is less chance of rebleeding in septic field.
Key words
Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Sentinel bleeding, Pseudoaneurysms, Embolization
Introduction
Major pancreatic surgery has advanced greatly in the last two decades with a dramatic decrease in its mortality rate. Pancreaticoduodenectomy operated by experienced surgeons is associated with a mortality of less than 5% and significantly reduced morbidity when compared with reports published before 1980 [1, 2]. Pancreatic and biliary fistulas and delayed gastric emptying are the most common complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The development and bleeding of visceral arterial pseudoaneurysms are rare phenomena and treatment dilemmas. Delayed hemorrhage, especially from a ruptured pseudoaneurysm, is a rare but rapidly progressing and potential life threatening complication following pancreaticoduodenectomies. I will make a review to analyze data on delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy due to pseudoaneurysm rupture.
Etiology of arterial hemorrhage by pseudoaneurysms
The complication of bleeding occurring through the abdominal drain tract or the gastrointestinal tract after pancreaticoduodenectomy is much less common. Leakage of pancreatic juice and bile, with a resulting fistula and intra-abdominal sepsis, is usually associated with pseudoaneurysm formation.Leak rates from pancreaticoenterostomies for pancreaticoduodenectomy vary from 6% to 24% and occur most often with a soft normal pancreas and a nondilated duct. For the most part, these fistulas are self-limiting and close spontaneously. Less frequently, abscess formation and vessel erosion develop. Brodsky and Turnbull [3] reported a “ Sentinel bleeding “ after pancreaticoduodenectomy that was attributed to vessel erosion. The vessels included hepatic, superior mesenteric, splenic, inferior pancreaticoduodenal, short gastric and gastroduodenal arteries. Pseudoaneurysm is a pulsatile hematoma that communicates with an artery via a disruption of the arterial wall. The pathogenesis for pseudoaneurysm formation remains unknown. However, digestion of an arterial vessel wall near a pancreaticojejunal leak by trypsin and elastase is one suggested mechanism. A postoperative intraabdominal hematoma that fails to reabsorb may serve as a nidus for infection near a peripancreatic vessel and form a pseudoaneurysm [4].
Various surgeons have developed different surgical techniques in an attempt to prevent pseudoaneurysm formation. Turrini et al., [5] suggested 1 cm of the gastroduodenal artery stump to minimize direct contact of pancreatic juice adjacent vessels. Koukoutsis et al., [6] suggested spreading an omental flap behind the pancreaticoduodenectomy site.
Sentinel bleeding was first described in 1989 by Shankar and Russel [7]. They defined it as gastrointestinal or intra-abdominal hemorrhage which occurs 6h to 10days prior to massive hemorrhage. Minor sentinel bleeding may herald consecutive devastating arterial bleeding originating from pseudoaneurysms or vascular erosion. In the study by Sato et al., [8], sentinel bleeding was noted in 10 patients with massive arterial hemorrhage out of 81pancreaticoduodenectomy patients and only one case of sentinel bleeding was not followed by massive hemorrhage. In the study by H G Lee [9], sentinel bleeding was evident in 21 of 27 cases (prevalence of 77.8%).
Therefore, it is important to adequately manage sentinel bleeding as soon as possible to prevent massive hemorrhage because sentinel bleeding is an important sign of massive hemorrhage.
How are these pseudoaneurysms best managed?
Embolization
Therapeutic embolization should be the initial procedure. This is technically easier for the patient and the surgeon, and there is less chance of rebleeding in septic field. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has been proven by many authors to be an efficient and minimal invasive alternative to open surgery [10, 11]. It has a success rate of 67 %-100%, morbidity rate of 14%-25%, and mortality rate of 0%-14%. Lee H G [9] and Martin L [12] reported that stent graft implantation to bridge the bleeding aneurysm led to immediate resolution of the complication. This procedure can be used as an alternative or in addition to embolization [13]. This technique has the advantage of providing continued perfusion to the end-organ and, therefore, obviates the risk of occlusion and ischemia often seen with embolization. In Lee HG’s study [9], a stent graft was used for a pseudoaneurysm of the common hepatic artery and superior mesenteric artery to maintain the visceral and liver blood flow.Stent grafting has the advantage of maintaining the peripheral blood flow and hence could be considered an alternative to embolization. However, it is a technically difficult procedure and requires adaptation to different sized vessels.
Open surgery
Brodsky and Turnbull recommend operative exploration in
septic patients who are bleeding, our experience has been otherwise. Surgical
laparotomy under such circumstances has been extraordinary difficult and
hazardous, because of surrounding postsurgical tissue friability. This may lead
to inaccurate ligation of a vessel, difficulty in controlling the bleeding or
rebleeding because of surround infection. In this serious emergency state,
surgery was considered prohibitive because localization and control of the
bleeding site would be extremely difficult in a patient status after
pancreaticoduodenectomty. Therefore, operative management is limited to patients
with hemodynamic instability, patients with vessels that are difficult or
impossible to catheterize, and patients in whom attempted angiographic
embolization has failed.
Conclusions
Bleeding pseudoaneurysms are a rare cause of delayed hemorrhage but these delayed hemorrhage are among the most serious and fatal complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Sentinel bleeding is an important sign of massive hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Sentinel bleeding indicates local sepsis and probable anastomotic dehiscence. Therefore, I think recognition of the significance of “sentinel bleeding” and prompt response may prevent exsanguination. Diagnostic angiography has been preferred during sentinel bleeding and is rapidly becoming the standard therapeutic treatment for bleeding pseudoanerysms.
Author’s contributions
NH: conceived and designed the study, prepared the draft manuscript and edited the manuscript.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
Ethical considerations
Not applicable
Funding
None declared
References
[1]. Grace PA, Pitt HA, Tomkins RK, DenBesten L, Longmire WP Jr . Decreased morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 1986;151:141-149 [Pubmed]
[2]. Pellegrini CA, Heck CF, Raper S, Way LW. An analysis of the reduced morbidity and mortality rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch surg 1989;124:778-781 [Pubmed]
[3]. Brodsky JT, Turnbull AD. Arterial hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the “sentinel bleed”. Arch Surg. 1991 Aug;126(8):1037-40. [Pubmed].
[4]. Thakker PV, Gajjar B, Wilkins RA, Levi AJ. Embolization of gastroduodenal artery aneurysms caused by chronic pancreatitis. Gut 1983;24:1094-1098 [Pubmed] [PMC fulltext]
[5]. Turrini O, Moutardier V, Guiramand J, Lelong B, Bories E, Sannini A, Magnin V, Viret F, Blache JL, Giovannini M, Delpero JR. Hemorrhage after duodenopancreatectomy: impact of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and experience with sentinel bleeding. World J Surg 2005; 29(2):212-6. [Pubmed]
[6]. Koukoutsis I, Bellagamba R, Morris-Stiff G, Wickremesekera S, Coldham C, Wigmore SJ, Mayer AD, Mirza DF, Buckels JA, Bramhall SR. Hemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the importance of sentinel bleed. Dig Surg 2006;23:224-228 [Pubmed]
[7]. Shanker S, Russel RC. Hemorrhage in pancreatic disease. Br J Surg 198;76:863-866 [Pubmed]
[8]. Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Shimizu S, Morisaki T, Yokohata K, Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M. Coil embolization of bleeding visceral pseudoaneurysms following pancreatectomy: the importance of early angiography. Arch Surg 1998;133:1099-1102 [Pubmed]
[9]. Lee HG, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW. Management of bleeding from pseudoaneurysms following pancreaticodudenectomy World J Gastroenterology 2010;14:1239-1244 [Pubmed]
[10]. De Castro SM, Busch OR, Gouma DJ. Management of bleeding and leakage after pancreatic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004;18:847-864 [Pubmed].
[11]. Otah E, Cushin BJ, Rozenblit GN, Neff R, Otah KE, Cooperman AM. Visceral artery pseudoaneurysms following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 2002;137:55-59 [Pubmed]
[12].Loveček M, Havlík R, Köcher M, Vomáčková K, Neoral C. Pseudoaneurysm of the gastroduodenal artery following pancreatoduodenectomy. Stenting for hemorrhage. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2014 Jun;9(2):297-301 [Pubmed] [PMC fulltext]
[13].Blanc T, Cortes A, Goere D, Sibert A, Pessaux P, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A. Hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: when is surgery still indicated? Am J Surg 2007;194:3-9[Pubmed]